A connected-care platform for independent healthcare organisations — one patient identity, shared safely across every facility, on FHIR R4 from day one.
One identity, resolved across every participating facility — not synced, not duplicated.
In a clinical record, colour spent on brand or delight is vocabulary stolen from criticality. So this interface stays almost entirely monochrome, and lets colour say exactly one thing: pay attention, right now.
Everything else on this screen — sixteen shades of the same near-black — has already faded from your attention. That's the design working correctly. The one fact that changes clinical behaviour is the only thing your eye can land on.
This isn't a mockup convention. It's the actual rule the product runs on: a dedicated colour is reserved for clinical severity, a completely separate one for identity-matching states, and neither is ever spent on branding.
When a patient self-registers with a slightly different name, the Master Patient Index doesn't just say "91% — probably a duplicate." It shows a data steward exactly which fields agree, which don't, and how each one was weighted — so a decision that permanently merges two medical records is made on evidence, not on trust in a black box.
Open the live comparisonThe prototype's guided tour follows a single patient, Kefilwe Mothibi, from registration at Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone through to a clinician reading her record at Nyangabgwe Referral Hospital in Francistown — a different organisation, not just a different building.
Every line item in the Phase-1 estimate maps to screens you can click through right now — not a slide describing what will eventually exist.
Nine guided steps, or explore freely — every screen is real, every number comes from live data.